Relativity and the Magnitude of Velocities
Abstract
In modern physics, relativity is primarily understood through the framework of Einstein’s theory. According to the special theory of relativity (STR), Galilean relativity serves as a very accurate approximation at low velocities, where ‘relativistic effects’ can be neglected. However, at high velocities, these effects become significant and are accurately described by STR. This paper challenges this understanding, arguing that the opposite is true. In Galilean relativity, the relativity of time is substantial and cannot be ignored. Thus, relative time is more negligible in STR than in Galilean relativity. By comparing Galilean relativity and STR through physical, mathematical, and specific examples, two conclusions are drawn: first, the current categorization of relativity theories based on velocity magnitude is artificial and inaccurate; second, the relativity of time can be ignored in special relativity, while it remains significant and cannot be overlooked in Galilean relativity.
References
Anker, J. and F. Ziegler (2020). Relativity Without Light: A New Proof of Ignatowski’s Theorem. Journal of Geometry and Physics; 103871
Berisha, V. and S. Klinaku (2017). The Only Pure Mathematical Error in the Special Theory of Relativity. Physics Essays, 30(4)
Berisha, V. and S. Klinaku (2018). The Lorentz Factor and the Law of Cosines. Physics Essays, 31(4)
Berisha, V. and S. Klinaku (2023). Invariance of the Acoustic Wave Equation Under Transformed Galilean Transformation. Acoustical Science and Technology, 44(1)
Bhadra, A., A. Chakraborty, S. Ghose, and B. Raychaudhuri (2023). Synchronization Gauge Field, Standing Waves and One-Way-Speed of Light. Physica Scripta, 98(12); 125024
Born, M. (2001). Die Relativitaetstheorie Einsteins. Springer, Berlin, 234 edition
Browne, K. M. (2020). Galilei Proposed the Principle of Relativity, But Not the Galilean Transformation. American Journal of Physics, 88; 207
Einstein, A. and L. Infeld (1938). Evolution of Physics. The Scientific Book Club, London
Feynman, R. (1977). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, volume 1. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Griffiths, D. J. (2024). Introduction to Electrodynamics. Pearson Education, Inc., 5th edition
Günther, H. and V. Müller (2019). The Special Theory of Relativity. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Halliday, D., R. Resnick, and J. Walker (2022). Fundamentals of Physics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 12th edition
Ignatowski, W. (1910). Das Relativitätsprinzip. Berliner Mathematische Gesellschaft und auf der 82. Naturforscher-Versammlung in Königsberg
Kamphorst, F., M. J. Vollebregt, E. R. Savelsbergh, and W. R. van Joolingen (2019). Students’ Preinstructional Reasoning with the Speed of Light in Relativistic Situations. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2); 020123
Klinaku, S. (2021). Galilean Transformation in Polar Coordinates and Doppler Effect. Results in Physics, 31; 104885
Klinaku, S. (2022). Geometric Representation of the Galilean Transformation. Results in Physics, 39; 105719
Klinaku, S. (2024). Galilean Relativity – Explained by Means of the Triangle Solutions. Results in Physics, 60; 107631
Lämmerzahl, C. (2005). Special Relativity and Lorentz Invariance. Annalen der Physik, 14(1-3); 71–102
Landau, L. D. and E. M. Lifshitz (1987). The Classical Theory of Fields, volume 2. Butterworth-Heinemann, 4th edition
Larmor, J. (1900). Aether and Matter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Laue, M. (1911). Die Relativitaetstheorie. Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn
Nolting, W. (2017). Theoretical Physics 4, Special Theory of Relativity. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland
O’Donnell, P. J. (2015). Essential Dynamics and Relativity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York
Serway, R. and J. J. Jr. (2014). Physics. Brooks/Cole, 9th edition
Welters, A., Y. Avniel, and S. G. Johnson (2014). Speed-of-Light Limitations in Passive Linear Media. Physical Review A, 90(2); 023847
Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.