Ensemble Method of Multiple Decision Trees with Crisp and Fuzzy Discretization for Axial Surface Roughness Prediction
Abstract
AISI 1045 is a steel used to make engine components for motor vehicles and aircraft. The quality of AISI 1045 is influenced by its surface roughness, both axial and tangential. The prediction of AISI 1045 surface roughness aims to produce quality products in a shorter time and at a lower cost. The axial surface roughness is in the form of certain grades according to ISO. This method is a prediction technique that combines several single prediction models to obtain better prediction results. In this work, the ensemble method is built using a voting system from an odd number of single prediction models of the decision trees. The proposed Single Model consists of one decision tree model with crisp discretization (DT1) and three models with fuzzy discretization (DT2, DT3, and DT4). The research data were obtained through experiments measuring the axial surface roughness of AISI 1045 steel using a wet machining system by considering cutting speed, feed motion, axial depth of cut, and tangential surface roughness. The study’s results indicate that not all proposed ensemble models are built to have better performance than single prediction models. Of the four proposed single prediction models, only one model has an accuracy above 80%, namely the decision tree model with fuzzy discretization using a combination of linear-trapezoidal fuzzy membership functions (DT4 model). The model performance based on accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score, and AUC is 80.73%, 48.53%, 73.47%, 58.44%, and 67.72%, respectively. For the four ensemble models formed from the combination of three Single decision tree models, only the combination of DT1, DT2, and DT3 does not perform better than the Single model. The other three ensemble methods have better accuracy, recall, and AUC than the performance of all proposed Single models with values of 81.33 - 82.67%, 51.62 - 55.19%, and 69.04 - 71.02%, respectively.
References
Algehyne, E. A., M. L. Jibril, N. A. Algehainy, O. A. Alamri, and A. K. Alzahrani (2022). Fuzzy Neural Network Expert System with an Improved Gini Index Random Forest-Based Feature Importance Measure Algorithm for Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Saudi Arabia. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 6(1); 13
Altay, A. and D. Cinay (2016). Fuzzy Decision Trees. In C. Kahraman and S. C. Onar, editors, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pages 221–261
Baldin, V. B., L. R. R. da Silva, R. Davis, M. J. Jackson, F. L. Amorim, C. F. Ferraz, Houck, and A. R. Machado (2023). Dry and MQL Milling of AISI 1045 Steel with Vegetable and Mineral-Based Fluids. Lubricants, 11(4); 175
Bhattacharyya, R. and S. Mukherjee (2021). Fuzzy Membership Function Evaluation by Non-Linear Regression: An Algorithmic Approach. Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 12; 412–434
Chen, Q. and M. Huang (2021). Rough Fuzzy-Model-Based Feature Discretization in Intelligent Data Preprocess. Journal of Cloud Computing, 10(5); 1–5
Dubey, V., A. K. Sharma, and D. Y. Pimenov (2022). Prediction of Surface Roughness Using Machine Learning Approach in MQL Turning of AISI 304 Steel by Varying Nanoparticle Size in the Cutting Fluid. Lubricants, 10(5); 81
Dutt, S., S. Chandramouli, and A. K. Das (2016). Machine Learning. Pearson India Education Service Pvt. Ltd., India
Femina, B. T. and E. M. Sudheep (2020). A Novel Fuzzy Linguistic Fusion Approach to Naive Bayes Classifier for Decision Making Applications. International Journal of Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(5); 1889–1897
Fernández, S., T. Ito, L. Cruz-Piris, and I. Marsá-Maestre (2022). Fuzzy Ontology-Based System for Driver Behavior Classification. Sensors, 22(20); 7954
Ganaie, M. A., M. Hu, A. Malik, M. Tanveer, and P. N. Suganthan (2022). Ensemble Deep Learning: A Review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 115; 105151
Kandananond, K. (2021). Surface Roughness Prediction of FFF-Fabricated Workpieces by Artificial Neural Network and Box–Behnken Method. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 12; 17
Karlos, S., G. Kostopoulos, and S. Kotsiantis (2020). A Soft-Voting Ensemble Based Co-Training Scheme Using Static Selection for Binary Classification Problems. Algorithms, 13(1); 26
Kresnawati, E. S., B. Suprihatin, and Y. Resti (2024). The Combinations of Fuzzy Membership Functions on Discretization in the Decision Tree-ID3 to Predict Degenerative Disease Status. Symmetry, 16(12); 1560
Livieris, I. E., A. Kanavos, V. Tampakas, and P. Pintelas (2019). A Weighted Voting Ensemble Self-Labeled Algorithm for the Detection of Lung Abnormalities from X-Rays. Algorithms, 12(3); 64
Lu, M., Q. Hou, S. Qin, L. Zhou, D. Hua, X. Wang, and L. Cheng (2023). A Stacking Ensemble Model of Various Machine Learning Models for Daily Runoff Forecasting. Water, 15(7); 1265
Muludi, K., R. Setianingsih, R. Sholehurrohman, and A. Junaidi (2024). Exploiting Nearest Neighbor Data and Fuzzy Membership Function to Address Missing Values in Classification. PeerJ Computer Science, 10; e1968
Pimenov, D. Y., A. Bustillo, and T. Mikolajczyk (2017). Artificial Intelligence for Automatic Prediction of Required Surface Roughness by Monitoring Wear on Face Mill Teeth. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(5); 1045–1061
Qasim, A., S. Nisar, A. Shah, M. S. Khalid, and M. A. Sheikh (2015). Optimization of Process Parameters for Machining of AISI-1045 Steel Using Taguchi Design and ANOVA. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 59; 36–51
Resti, Y., N. Eliyati, M. Rahmayani, D. E. Zayanti, E. S. Kresnawati, E. S. Cahyono, and I. Yani (2024). Ensemble of Naive Bayes, Decision Trees, and Random Forests to Predict Air Quality. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI), 13(1); 1–10
Resti, Y., C. Irsan, A. Neardiaty, C. Annabila, and I. Yani (2023). Fuzzy Discretization on the Multinomial Naïve Bayes Method for Modeling Multiclass Classification of Corn Plant Diseases and Pests. Mathematics, 11(8); 1761
Roy, A. and S. K. Pal (2003). Fuzzy Discretization of Feature Space for a Rough Set Classifier. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(6); 895–902
Rutkowski, L. (2004). Flexible Neuro-Fuzzy Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, FL, USA
Setiawan, A., E. R. Arumi, and P. Sukmasetya (2020). Fuzzy Membership Functions Analysis for Usability Evaluation of Online Credit Hour Form. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 15(5); 3189–3203
Shanmugapariya, M., H. K. Nehemiah, R. S. Bhuvaneswaran, K. Arputharaj, and J. D. Sweetlin (2017). Fuzzy Discretization Based on Classification of Medical Data. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 14(8); 291–298
Sokolova, M. and G. Lapalme (2009). A Systematic Analysis of Performance Measures for Classification Tasks. Information Processing and Management, 45(4); 427–437
Tinh, P. D. and T. T. N. Mai (2021). Ensemble Learning Model for Wi-Fi Indoor Positioning Systems. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI), 10(1); 200–206
Wang, M. R., M. N. Cheng, M. Y. M. Loh, C. Wang, and C. F. Cheung (2022). Ensemble Learning with a Genetic Algorithm for Surface Roughness Prediction in Multi-Jet Polishing. Expert Systems with Applications, 207; 118024
Woo, C.-S. and W.-M. Lee (2015). A Study of the Machining Characteristics of AISI 1045 Steel and Inconel 718 with a Cylindrical Shape in Laser-Assisted Milling. Applied Thermal Engineering, 91; 33–42
Yazgi, T. G. and K. Necla (2015). An Aggregated Fuzzy Naive Bayes Data Classifier. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 286; 17–27
Zhao, M. and N. Ye (2024). High-Dimensional Ensemble Learning Classification: An Ensemble Learning Classification Algorithm Based on High-Dimensional Feature Space Reconstruction. Applied Sciences, 14(5); 1956
Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.